Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steersman's avatar

Quite a good essay, interesting bits of history on Argentina. Any connections from the latter to the fairly famous song, "Don't Cry for Me Argentina"?

But this certainly gives one -- a man -- some pause for thought:

Pythia: "... one free throw to a mean and misandrist online feminist who thinks all men are evil."

If it were only one such "mean and misandrist online feminist" then your argument might have carried more weight. Except there isn't just one; some reason to argue that many if not most feminists, academic ones at least, so qualify. The thing there is that "feminism" -- as a philosophy, as a "project" for the emancipation of the proletariat, at least the distaff side of it -- is something of a joke, being charitable. Much of it is incoherent and quite unscientific twaddle, and damned be anyone, any man in particular, who points out that the Emperor -- Empress in fact -- is as naked as a jaybird.

For example, a feminist of the academic breed, Jane Gilmore, was recently railing against the "backlash against feminism" -- where I see you weighed in -- while seeming rather "reluctant" to consider the argument that feminism is, in fact, something of a joke, being charitable. For example, I -- rather diffidently, I thought -- attempted to show where her use of "gender" was not particularly coherent, and not at all consistent with more credible "sects" of feminism:

https://janegilmore.substack.com/p/do-i-hate-men-should-i-hate-them/comment/289687329

And got blocked and banned for my troubles with that comment of mine hidden there.

If y'all want to start "working the locks", then you might want to consider which ones feminism itself put there.

No posts

Ready for more?